The peer review process at Acta Universalis Medicinae is integral to maintaining the journal's high-quality standards. The journal uses a double-blind review process, ensuring that both the authors' and reviewers' identities remain confidential throughout the review.

1. Initial Submission Review:

• Upon submission, the editorial team performs an initial assessment to verify that the manuscript fits within the journal’s scope and meets basic quality standards, including originality, relevance, and adherence to the journal’s guidelines.

2. Double-Blind Peer Review:

• If the manuscript passes the initial review, it is assigned to at least two independent experts in the relevant field. These peer reviewers evaluate the manuscript based on criteria such as:
• Originality and significance of the research
• Methodological rigor and data analysis
• Clarity and accuracy of the presentation
• Adherence to ethical standards
• The relevance and contribution to the field of internal medicine
• Reviewers are asked to provide detailed, constructive feedback and recommend one of the following actions:
• Accept
• Minor revisions
• Major revisions
• Reject

3. Revision Process:

• If revisions are requested, the authors will be given an opportunity to address the reviewers’ comments and resubmit the revised manuscript. The revised submission will typically be re-evaluated by the same reviewers.

4. Final Decision:

• Based on the reviewers' recommendations and the authors’ responses, the handling editor will make a final decision. This decision may include acceptance, further revision, or rejection.

5. Time Frame:

• Acta Universalis Medicinae aims to complete the review process efficiently, with an average review time of 4-6 weeks, though this can vary depending on the complexity of the manuscript and reviewer availability.

6. Ethical Guidelines:

• Reviewers are expected to maintain confidentiality and objectivity throughout the process and must declare any conflicts of interest that could influence their evaluation.

7. Acknowledgment of Reviewers:

• Reviewers who consistently provide high-quality reviews may be acknowledged on the journal’s website and invited to join the journal’s editorial board.